Writing Advice: The Art, The Craft, The Cons
Sometimes the best advice is not to take it. Except this. Take this advice.
As part of what I think my job is here, I sometimes wander around the internets checking out the many sites that offer writing advice. There are good ones—a lot of good ones written by excellent writers who have been there—but then there are those that are bad. They’re the ones written by people who have no right to call themselves writers. They’re marketers, they’re ‘content’ pushers, they’re con artists looking to make a buck off of the yokels.
Too much of today’s writing advice is a con. When they’re not focused on marketing (putting the cart before the horse for newbies), they’re pawning off lazy repeats of olden day writing basics, and they’re charging for it.
What could be new that isn’t already out there? What could we tell new writers today that hasn’t always been true—other than showing them the mechanics of modern-day, online publishing? The mechanics are valid lessons. Creatives who want a future at this won’t get anywhere today without mastering at least the basics of how to physically produce a piece and how to promote/market it in the internet age.
But here at Writer Everlasting I want to focus on the writing itself. You and I know we get better at writing by writing. How we say stuff is what separates us from everyone else. Once we’ve found our voice nobody else can lay claim to it. It’s ours. It’s our signature.
It’s the one thing I would want to get across to new writers: be yourself, right from the start. If you’re sure you have something to say—and you can sustain it—do it your way. (Note: There are always those gems you can pluck out of good writers’ words. You’ll know then by how they hit you in the gut. You don’t have to copy them, just emulate them. Catch their rhythm, see what stopped you in your tracks.)
It crushes me to see wannabe writers as victims, and I see tons of them out there. They want more than anything to get to a point where writing pays the bills, and they don’t want it to take long. They’re ripe for the picking.
It seems to them there are a whole lot of writers no better at it than they are who are making it, so what’s the magic door-opener? There has to be a key—something they’re missing that every successful writer must know about.
And they go looking in all the wrong places, often shelling out big bucks for what this time might just be the magic bullet, the golden ring, the exact thing they’re going to need...
I’ve written about this before:
If you go to Amazon and type in “books on writing”, as I did today, you’ll find over 60,000 of them. That’s just books. That’s not magazines, conferences, courses, seminars, or webinars. That’s not individual coaching, for-profit editing, or the bazillions of internet articles, often paywalled, on how to be a better writer.
I’ve written a few of those how-tos myself. In fact, and you’ll find some of them here. But I’m frustrated by the lie that anyone can become a writer without actually sitting down and writing until the hours turn into days, then into weeks, then into months, then into years. There are no easy shortcuts, no magic elixirs, no honest way to become a writer without the required apprenticeship.
I feel the need to keep repeating that.
Just do the writing. Learn to write so uniquely people will want to read every word.
Learn to write uniquely. It’s the logical, necessary first step in order to lift us from the crowd. And it takes the most practice.
Think of it: there is no other art or craft that suggests ‘anyone can do it’ without an apprenticeship—that period when you know your limitations and you expect it’ll take hard work and lots and lots of time.
No potter looks at that first lump of clay and says, “Oh, I get it…”
No visual artist wakes up and says, “I think I’ll be a painter. How hard could it be? A few tubes of paint, a canvas, a couple of brushes…”
No musician watches a video and says, “Everybody’s playing guitar. I think I’ll play, too. Maybe get on stage tonight…”
Writing looks easy because, on the face of it, it is easy. Would-be writers have been doing it since kindergarten or before. They’re not afraid of it like they might be with a lump of clay or a paint brush or an instrument.
They need to be afraid of it. Then they can tackle writing as an art and a craft deserving of attention and humility. We’re not writers because we say we are, we’re writers because we’ve proven we’re writers.
Writing well takes a good bit of doing, and, if I’m being honest, I resent those clueless hardheads who think because they’ve written a few thousand words that sound pretty good to them, they deserve a seat at the head table. They don’t. They’re taking up space and cluttering our habitats. The field is getting too crowded because of them and they’re making those of us who work at it less visible.
Is that harsh? My space here is called ‘Writer Everlasting’ for a reason. I’m here to give comfort and community to working writers, no matter our station or our talents, and that includes serious newbies.
I’m all for ‘paying it forward’ but I’m not here for hobbyists or amateurs. There are other places that speak to their needs, and they’ll be much happier there.
I’m not here to promote con artists who thrive on making writing look like anyone can do it by following a few simple steps.
I’m here to celebrate and encourage writers who write.
I could be shooting myself in the foot, since my goal is to build this place, but my loyalties lie with writers who have gone through or are going through the process and understand it’s not for sissies.
So again, my friends, what do you think? Comments, as always, are open. Let’s talk!
More on this, and the books I’ve read:
It is a difficult one to opine on given I am a new / wannabe writer. I have bought a couple of books on writing, e.g. by Steven King and Natalie Goldberg. I plan on taking a creative writing course but deciding on the best option for me given full time employment. I have done a few Domestika courses which have helped a little. I am not sure what a seat at the head table would look like. The relatively young writers I have met on here - and this is the only community of writers I have at the moment, it needs to be pointed out - all strike me as rather humble and unsure in their abilities, never boastful. That includes myself, I would like to think. For me, and this may be a simplified view of the world, the newbies, who think are good but are not, will learn the hard way; trying to take someone else's seat will not be relevant for long, if they truly are that unskilled and self - assured for no reason. Having said that, is 'good' not rather subjective? One man's trash is another man's treasure, however the saying goes. I can think of a few successful, celebrated authors whose work I dislike (to put it very politely) but many others enjoy their craft. Is having a unique voice, which is something highlighted time and time again, the same as being 'good'? How do we measure 'good'? Whose view of 'good' gets to impact who sits at the table? I have no idea...
The first thing about writing, is reading. I've read a lot of "shit writing", and I've read writing that has brought me to tears just for the sheer beauty of it. If you write something and it doesn't "speak" to you, you have to revise it, and then revise it again. I think some people write a piece and think that's it, that's as good as it's going to get, and then they self publish it--just because they can. And when no one reads it, they tell themselves it's because they don't "get" it. Maybe they don't get it because they don't like it? Maybe they don't like it because of the obvious grammatical errors? Writing is about using your senses as well--you have to feel the cold of the rain, because it's not just rain; it's about hearing the thunder rattle the windows of the small hillside cabin; it's when you taste the love that went into the food because it's more than just potatoes and gravy; you see the sunset as more than just colours, but colours on an artist's palette. Writing is about reaching into your soul, and touching someone's heart.